POLITICS: Can National be National?

Delegates to the National party’s conference early next month will be buzzing with anticipated victory. The excitement will obscure sobering question: is National national?
In the 1950s and 1960s and even into the 1970s when it siphoned many wage-workers off Labour, National proclaimed itself, with cause, the national party. Labour, it said, was captive to the unions and therefore sectional.
Now it is National which looks sectional: wall-to-wall white. Last year, out of 600 conference delegates, only about 15 were non-white.
Labour’s conference, by contrast, is United Nations of colour and ethnicity. Women and gays are there in numbers and influence. It even has space for out-of-the-closet, practising Christians.
But the polls tell us John Key is the great uniter. Like Kevin Rudd in Australia last year, Key is killing policy differences from Labour that might lose or deter converts. He will keep the railways, position near inconceivable year or two back. He will keep compulsory employer contributions to KiwiSaver. He will not pare national superannuation.
He differs from Labour only when he discerns that party to be out of step with the majority. The greenhouse gas emissions trading scheme is to wait year, in deference to farmers, big emitters and car drivers. He implies Labour is soft on crime without offering much tougher policy. He says he will give bigger tax cuts, but not at the cost of public services – in fact, he implies he will deliver more health care. And, by raising more debt and doing deals with private financiers, he says he will deliver more broadband, more roads and more science.
The message to centrist voters is: “You are safe with me.” The state-house boy is not Don Brash throwback to the early 1990s. Key paints himself as man of the future, architect of new prosperity.
Pre-election, it is all plausible. Post-election, there are two question marks.
One is deliverability. In slowing economy will Key actually be able credibly to make bigger tax cuts than Michael Cullen promised in May without risking return to persistent budget deficits, as in the United States?
Pre-election, Key can skate round this by promising to “restructure” the tax system – that is, take tax off in one place and add it in another. Reshaping or replacing Working for Families is one possibility but he doesn’t need to be too specific before polling day.
Moreover, unless the economy really goes to the pack and his government (if he is elected) wobbles as result, Key can probably lay any failures or slow progress at Helen Clark’s door for term or two.
But Key does not want just to mind the shop. He wants to be remembered for engineering an economic step-change. He much admires Singapore and Ireland.
Locking himself into existing policy lines, with bit more spent on infrastructure, standards and choice in education and higher profile for science, is not an obvious route to step-change.
A step-change will require risk and boldness. Both are in Key’s nature, so far suppressed but implied in, for example, his emphasis that asset sell-downs and sell-offs are off the plate only for “the first term”.
But risk and boldness can lose votes. And, unless Labour plunges disastrously in this election, he is likely, if elected, to face regenerating opposition with vigour and new ideas.
Which brings us to the second question mark for happy conference delegates: is National national?
Some in National muse on winning this election outright. Most reckon they will need only Act and United Future – at most, New Zealand First – with no need to pitch to the Maori party or the Greens.
But, if so, what about after the 2011 election? How does National lock into and lock up big brown and yellow votes? Can it convince enough greens and women to stay?
The party is selecting some promising women and non-white candidates. Nikki Kaye, multidisciplinary 28-year-old who could win Auckland Central off Judith Tizard, Sam Lotu-liga, 37, high-achieving Samoan lawyer and city councillor, and Hekia Parata, formidable figure in Maoridom, are examples. The challenge is to make such people commonplace and give National convincing claim to reach beyond the white male pale, to be broad enough to claim long periods in office, as after 1949.
In short, Key’s real challenge is to make National national party again.

[* Last month’s column said the Ministry of Women’s Affairs budget is $14.3 million, The correct figure is $1.43 million.]

Colin James is New Zealand’s leading political commentator and NZ Management’s regular political columnist.

Visited 2 times, 1 visit(s) today

A focus on culture

Rabobank’s 520-plus New Zealand employees work from 27 locations – places like Ashburton, Pukekohe and Feilding and from a purpose-built head office in Hamilton. Its employees are proud of the

Read More »
Close Search Window